Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Agentic RAG

Definition

Agentic RAG (also called Agent RAG or Agentic Retrieval) is an advanced RAG architecture where retrieval is not a single fixed step but a dynamic, multi-step process controlled by an AI agent. Unlike naive RAG (which retrieves once and generates), agentic RAG uses an LLM-powered agent that can: decide whether retrieval is needed, choose between multiple retrieval tools or knowledge sources, iteratively refine queries based on what was found, retrieve additional information if initial results are insufficient, and synthesize information from multiple retrieval steps into a coherent final answer. The agent operates in a ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) loop until it determines it has sufficient information.

Why It Matters

Agentic RAG is necessary for complex questions that cannot be answered from a single retrieval step. Multi-hop questions ('What are the integration capabilities of the plan that includes the feature X, and what is its pricing?') require retrieving information about the feature, then looking up the plan that includes it, then finding pricing for that plan — three separate retrieval steps that must be chained based on what was found. Simple RAG architectures cannot handle this; agentic RAG can. For AI chatbot applications handling complex, multi-part questions, agentic RAG dramatically improves answer completeness and accuracy.

How It Works

Agentic RAG is implemented using an LLM agent with retrieval tools. The agent receives the user's query and a set of tools (e.g., search_knowledge_base, lookup_pricing_table, get_account_information). The agent follows a ReAct loop: Thought (reason about what information is needed), Action (call a retrieval tool), Observation (process the retrieval result), repeat until sufficient information is gathered, then generate the final answer. Frameworks like LangChain Agents, LlamaIndex Agents, and OpenAI Assistants provide infrastructure for building agentic RAG systems. The agent's reliability depends on the quality of the retrieval tools and the agent's ability to reason about when to stop retrieving.

Agentic RAG — Iterative Reasoning Loop

UserComplex Query

Agent

LLM orchestrator

ReAct Loop

max 5 iterations
1

Plan

Decompose into sub-tasks

2

Execute

Retrieve, reason, act

3

Observe

Check result quality

Enough context?

No

Loop back

Yes

Continue

1
2
3
4
5

Final Answer

Synthesized from all retrieval steps

Real-World Example

A 99helpers customer serves enterprise clients with complex pricing structures. Simple questions like 'What is the Enterprise plan price?' use standard RAG. But complex questions like 'We have 500 users who need SSO and API access — what plan do we need and what will it cost with annual billing?' require multi-hop reasoning: retrieve feature requirements, look up plan comparison, find pricing for qualifying plans, then calculate annual billing discount. An agentic RAG architecture chains these retrievals automatically, generating a complete, accurate quote recommendation — something simple RAG cannot do.

Common Mistakes

  • Using agentic RAG for simple questions where single-step RAG suffices — agents add latency and complexity; reserve for genuinely multi-hop questions
  • Not setting maximum iteration limits — an agent without iteration limits can enter long reasoning loops, consuming time and API tokens before timing out
  • Insufficient tool descriptions — the agent selects tools based on their descriptions; vague or inaccurate descriptions cause the agent to use wrong tools or get stuck

Related Terms

Ready to build your AI chatbot?

Put these concepts into practice with 99helpers — no code required.

Start free trial →
What is Agentic RAG? Agentic RAG Definition & Guide | 99helpers | 99helpers.com